Active Agenda: Hazard Abatement and Hazard Reporting
The difference between effective hazard abatement programs and those that consume gloves and fingers, is often the system utilized to manage hazard reporting.
Article Tools
Advertisement
Top Articles
Most Popular
E-Mailed
Discussed
Recent
I was resting comfortably (on my laurels) in my office when the
operations manager entered holding a bloody, shredded glove. An
employee’s hand was pulled into a chain conveyor, but
thankfully, her fingers were intact.
After inspecting the machine, it was obvious this incident could
have been prevented. After interviewing employees, and calling our
sister facilities, we discovered the incident was not only
predicted, but we had incurred an amputation on the same type of
machine at our east coast facility several years before. Our
management systems had failed.
Although the practice of identifying, tracking and abating hazards
is a simple and practical method of loss control, many businesses
fail to collect information and take action (e.g., share, then
abate) to resolve issues before they result in loss.
The difference between effective hazard abatement programs and
those that consume gloves and fingers is often the system utilized
to manage hazard reporting. Many organizations duplicate hazard
reporting along functional lines, thereby adding to the confusion
and administration required to effectively prioritize and abate
hazards across an enterprise.
Active Agenda’s Hazard Reporting module is designed to
collect hazard reports and centralize the information using a
single business process. These reports then can be made available
across departments, facilities and time zones.
Many years on the receiving end of hazard reports has taught us
that one hazard report can communicate many hazards. The Hazard
Reporting module allows you to associate many hazards with a single
report. In fact, many hazard reports indicate that hazards are
present in more than one functional area. For example, the Hazard
Reporting module can address all functional areas of a facility,
including:
•Human Safety
•Product Quality/Safety
•Property Protection
•Labor Relations
•Environmental Protection
•Operational Efficiency
•Customer Satisfaction
Each hazard report entered can be associated with many hazards,
which then can be associated with many functional areas and
controls. This makes the organization’s hazard list, and
related control hierarchy, easy to track, measure and manage. In
other words, ANSI Z10 made simple ... and better.
What Gets Measured
All hazards entered into Active Agenda are associated with risk
likelihood and risk severity. The likelihood and severity
assignments combine to create a risk index and related
recommendations. These values can be changed to reflect each
organization’s preferred terms and values. This process
assists with the prioritization of hazards for abatement purposes
and occurs automatically within Active Agenda.
Risk Likelihood: The default risk likelihood categories
used by Active Agenda include:
•Remote (Extremely unlikely to occur)
•Low (Possible but unlikely to occur)
•Moderate (Moderate risk of occurrence)
•High (Likely to occur)
•Probable (Very likely to occur in immediate future)
Risk Severity: The default risk severity categories used by
Active Agenda include:
•Slight (Minor First Aid Injury OR $50)
•Appreciable (Injury involving physician OR $50 -
$1,000)
•Serious (Serious injury or illness OR $1,000 -
$100,000)
•Severe (Death or disabling injury OR $100,000 -
$1,000,000)
•Catastrophic (Deaths &/or disabling injuries OR
>$1,000,000)
Risk Recommendations: Active Agenda utilizes the following
default risk recommendation categories:
•Take action if and when appropriate
•Take action when practical
•Take all reasonable action as soon as possible
•Take action immediately
The Hazard Reporting module collects hazard reports from across the
enterprise in a central “bucket.” This central view of
organizational hazards can be filtered, reported and charted based
on any field used to report hazards. The Hazard Reporting module
tracks and measures hazard types, locations, personal
accountabilities, hazard status, abatement costs, actions assigned,
hazard locations, financial exposures or opportunities, resolution
delays and more.
What Gets Done
Active Agenda automatically generates hazard reporting forms for
data collection so that reports will be made (multi-language). The
module then allows for the assignment of abatement accountabilities
so that reported hazards don’t fall through the cracks. If an
employee leaves, accountabilities can be easily transferred to an
incumbent. The module also enables facility comparisons and
calculates resolution delays.
By using the Active Agenda module for Hazard Reporting, - hazard
reporting, tracking, accountability, abatement and communication
gets done ... before gloves get pulled into machines!
This Month’s Links:
Written Program
Support Wiki
Forum
Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2009 Penton Media Inc.